Scripting Helpers is winding down operations and is now read-only. More info→
Ad
Log in to vote
1

The for loop in my client script is not being run/ nor outputting anything. Any ideas?

Asked by 5 years ago

Hi guys, A bit of help is needed here.

I have a script that uses RemoteFunctions. Everything works on the server side, and most of it on the client side. The problem i have is that I have a for loop in the client script that isnt running. It did work at some point but it no longer does. The script works fine, but it just skips the for loop, and its something I really need to have working. Please see the code below. any help would be appreciated!

This is the for loop

for i = 1,120,-1 do
    script.Parent.Submit.Text = "YOU MUST WAIT "..i.." SECONDS"
    wait(1)
end

This is the script which the for loop is in.

debounce = false

script.Parent.Submit.MouseButton1Click:connect(function()
    if debounce == false then
        debounce = true
        script.Parent.Submit.Text = "SENDING. PLASE WAIT..."
        local reportedplr = script.Parent.ReportPlayer.Text
        local details = script.Parent.ReportReason.Text
        local API_Sender = game.ReplicatedStorage.ReportAPI_Config.DiscordReportAPI
        local result = API_Sender:InvokeServer(reportedplr,details)

        if result == "ok" then
            script.Parent.Submit.Text = "SENT!"
        else
            script.Parent.Submit.Text = "ERROR SENDING REPORT, TRY AGAIN"
            print(result)
        end

        wait(5)

        for i = 1,120,-1 do
            script.Parent.Submit.Text = "YOU MUST WAIT "..i.." SECONDS"
            wait(1)
        end

        script.Parent.Submit.Text = "SUBMIT"
        debounce = false
    end
end)

1 answer

Log in to vote
0
Answered by
Astralyst 389 Moderation Voter
5 years ago
Edited 5 years ago

You're doing the for loop other way around.

it should be

for i = 120, 1, -1 do
script.Parent.Submit.Text = "YOU MUST WAIT "..i.." SECONDS"
wait(1)
end

Your current method would count from 1 to 120 in a -1, even explaining it would sound confusing.

If my solution didn't work, then the problem is probably not the for loop, you might want to check if there's any parts underlined or there's an error output.

Hope this helps!

0
brilliant, it works now. No idea how I managed to make such a rookie mistake like this. thanks!!! MrTomasboy 13 — 5y
0
Haha, no problem. Astralyst 389 — 5y
Ad

Answer this question