I will make a script that will give the player a tool when he is standing on a part Example - player steps on a plate and he gets a sword and when he steps off the sword will disappear.
I will script all of that tool giving stuff myself, but I don't have any clue on how to see when the player is on the part.
I don't think I can just use a Touched event, because it will only detect the player stepping on the platform and not stepping off.
The above code detects whether a player has a humanoid if it does then it will read true once the player has stepped of a part.
local debounce = true
script.Parent.TouchEnded:Connect(function(hit)
if debounce then
if hit.Parent:FindFirstChild("Humanoid") then
debounce = false
wait(1)
print ("Player stepped on a part")
end
end
end)
You can use TouchEnded.
local sp = script.Parent
sp.Touched:connect(function(hit)
if hit.Parent:findFirstChild("Humanoid") then -- Check if its a player
--give weapon
end
end)
sp.TouchEnded:connect(function(hit)
if hit.Parent:findFirstChild("Humanoid") then -- Checks for player
local player = game.Players:GetPlayerFromCharacter(hit.Parent) -- Gets player from character
player.Backpack:findFirstChild("TOOLNAME"):Destroy() -- Destroys tool
end
end);
There are more efficient ways, but this is fine where you're at.
I made an even simplier script.
Once again, read the question carefully.
and bruh, please stop editing your script just to copy other people's answers. You got me dead. First you use .Touched now now TouchEnded wdh
@Infocus, I was a beginner then, relax.
i know this thing's over a year but im looking at my older answers.
Also your code is very inneficient. You're using the lower-case c for :Connect, also, there's no debounce, so essentially, the script will work once, then it error since there's no tool afterwards.
This discussion is preserved as it was. New answers, comments, and votes are closed.
10 comments
Please stop feeding people wrong information. Answering fast isn't answering smart. This will error anyways because you didn't close the conditional statement and the event
shut up infocus maybe he did act smart and gave PARTIAL code cause the guy didnt even try
infocus, your a bloody idiot
btw, its me smiley_face on sh discord, still infocus may be the goldfish
o sweet i got sum upvotes
ur welcome
thank you
Idk who any of you are. He started answering on my thread with wrong info and then nearly copied another answer afterwards. Go ahead and support the wrong answers. This is why people never learn because you guys are too scared to correct them.
Sorry for the incorrect answer, I was in a rush and I didn't test it out.
Also I still wasn't that good at scripting a year ago, so calm your self. Everyone improves as they get older at something.