Wouldn't this be easier than using Vector3?
game.Workspace.Part.Position()
COMMUNITY QUESTION
So if Vector3 is just a coordinate you use for a part, why not jut use the parts position?
1 answer
This makes absolutely no sense... Yes a parts position is a Vector3 but what do you mean by "Wouldn't this be easier than using Vector3?" plus you the position of a part is not a function it is a property so you access it like this:
game.Workspace.Part.Position
without the brackets.
This discussion is preserved as it was. New answers, comments, and votes are closed.
1 comment
When I look up "Vector3" I get Vector3.new and a bunch of other things except for what and how you use Vector3. I simply thought it was just another way of giving a part's position. Which made me wonder why it was even made.